The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.
Displayed in the pie charts is the proportion of water which was used by various sectors in Sydney of Australia between 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the food industry spent the highest percentage of water, whereas the lowest figure was accessed by the building industry over the period given.
With regard to the water used in 1997, the food industry accounted for nearly half, which was followed by the percentage of household with 19%. Subsequently, the water spent by manufacturing made up 15%, was three times the figure for the building industry, and another was the percentage of the service industry with 13%.
In the final of the period, there was a slight decrease to 41% in the rate of water spent in the food industry as opposed to the figure for the service industry with a quarter. Subsequently, 21% was the proportion of water usage in the household, which was bigger than the manufacturing with 11% and the building industry with 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Drragkloha | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Lucy_067 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | BangLangTim | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007. 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82530120482 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61685110603 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475903614458 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 16.6674999792 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193214531193 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130300331747 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139385651882 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167711789285 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154502720032 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.