The reading and the lecture are both about Robert E.Peary explore the North Pole in 1909. The Author of the reading gave three explanation points about Possibility of his trip. However, lecturer casts doubts on the claims made in the article. He challenges all the reasons provided by explaining that It is not true.
First of all, article states that committee arranged by National Geographic Society proved that Peary's trip was justified after investigation. Furthermore, he says that his trip was consistent because they have records to prove. This claims is challenged by the professor. He states that this investigation committee was formed by his friends so it was a bias result. In Addition he rebuts arguments that investigation was just for two days only so it was not that much persuasive .
Secondly, author contends that he reached to the North Pole in just 37 days. He says that another explorer named Tom Every recently did same trip in less than 37 days with same kind of weight and dogsled. Lecturer oppose this arguments given in article. He suggested that they both have different kind of trips. Furthermore he argues that, Avery had less food and most of his food was transported by aero plane and not only that, the weather was favorable too.
Finally, reading passage states that photographs taken by Pearly, provide strong evidence he reached to north pole. Article states that measuring shadow make it possible to count the surfs position in the sun.
However, professor posits that, the photograph was taken before 100 years ago. Furthermore, he puts forth the idea that Photograph is quite faded and blurry so calculate the distance from photograph is not reliable .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...and the lecture are both about Robert E.Peary explore the North Pole in 1909. The Aut...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explores'.
Suggestion: explores
...e lecture are both about Robert E.Peary explore the North Pole in 1909. The Author of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Peary) must be used with a third-person verb: 'explores'.
Suggestion: explores
...e lecture are both about Robert E.Peary explore the North Pole in 1909. The Author of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...they have records to prove. This claims is challenged by the professor. He states ...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Addition,
...his friends so it was a bias result. In Addition he rebuts arguments that investigation ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... only so it was not that much persuasive . Secondly, author contends that he re...
^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...me kind of weight and dogsled. Lecturer oppose this arguments given in article. He sug...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...they both have different kind of trips. Furthermore he argues that, Avery had less food and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Finally, reading passage states that photographs taken by Pearly, provide str...
^^
Line 8, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...distance from photograph is not reliable .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, as for, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04982206406 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61258617327 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8549473793 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.