Since twenty century there have been more and more occupations allow different genders to apply positions and gender equality has been mentioned very common. With the government support to the proportion of demanding jobs could equally gives opportunities to citizens who is capable in the position. I totally agree that jobs reserved for women could lead to an even and justifying employment equality, which could improve the development of society.
Since industrial revolution, female were increasingly introduced to work fields due to the fact that there were lack of labor force during the war period. A surprising result came along is that women could have the even or better performances than men in terms of the will of devotion. There is no doubt that men and women are born naturally in diverse physical appearance and in different body strengths. However, under the appropriate training of physical exercises, female is able to endure the force and carry the same weight like men.
Furthermore, there were some scientist researches involving general personalities of different genders. For instance, men are tend to be more bold and ambitious while women are tend to be more sensitive and gentle. These researches for the further explanations could exactly state that men and women have their own merits and drawbacks repectibely which if we use one's advantages to the proper position will leads to a positive effect. In addition, different sex employment could offer diverse perspectives to one certain issue.
Human’s potential is unlimited which should not be constrained by biological body or other natural diversity. I strongly believe that with gender equality in employment will give the enterprise a positive effect and result under government's encouragement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
Since twenty century there have been more and more occupatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...portion of demanding jobs could equally gives opportunities to citizens who is capabl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...ifferent genders. For instance, men are tend to be more bold and ambitious while wom...
^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...more bold and ambitious while women are tend to be more sensitive and gentle. These ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... merits and drawbacks repectibely which if we use ones advantages to the proper po...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d drawbacks repectibely which if we use ones advantages to the proper position will ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... advantages to the proper position will leads to a positive effect. In addition, diff...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...rise a positive effect and result under governments encouragement.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40357142857 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90969307239 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1843155843 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175137618267 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566234021899 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456814387521 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960874977584 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030779218561 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.