It is said that more refugees ought to be accepted by wealthy nations and provided them with basic aid like accommodation and food. From my viewpoint, I completely agree that developed countries should help refugees. First of all, wealthy countries are able to accept a larger number of refugees and support them with accommodation and food because they have the resources to do so and secondly, most developed countries have sufficient shelter capacity to meet the need for thousands of homeless.
Wealthy countries receive millions of dollars for their economic activities annually, and that income is enough to cover their annual budget and the surplus money could be channeled to supply refugees with food. Experts assert that the annual surplus budget from developed countries is about a billion dollars. For example, The International Monetary Fund revealed that the surplus funds just between the US and China was nearly 678 million dollars in the fiscal year 2015, and this alone would be sufficient to host and feed thousands of refugees.
Moreover, developed countries have adequate infrastructures to host a bigger number of immigrants and offer them the necessary assistance. The United States, Spain, and Russia, three of the countries with the largest economies, have the ability to provide accommodation to about 600 thousand homeless that enter their countries asking for asylum. The New York Times reported in 2015 that developed countries were officially recognized as countries which have more than enough shelters to offer more comfort to exiles.
To conclude, it is a great idea for rich countries to accept more refugees their nations and provide them the necessary aid because they have enough funds to do so, and adequate infrastructures to shelter more immigrants.
this the most stupid essay
this the most stupid essay grader I've tried ever! this essay scored for real 7.5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39788732394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76468101575 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524647887324 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6400032982 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.3 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30362157744 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132475665492 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911935339489 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20002802057 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103189854494 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.