Over the years, there has been an increase in the appearance of the campaigns which aim to raise the public’s awareness about issues such as environment, poverty and animal welfare. This attempt, in turn, has great positive impacts on young people’s perception. In this essay, I would like to provide some actual evidence for this argument.
As the development of society, our life nowadays is far different from the past generation. Our ancestors had to struggle with wars and poverty. Foods were not always sufficient for them to survive, not to mention education. Their lives were the most priority, thus they did not have reason or time for caring about the earth. Unlike them, young people nowadays are living in a peaceful environment with an excellent live condition, they are generally well-educated too. Moreover, this information era has brought to them all of the real-time information around the world including how the earth, the animal and the poor in other parts of the world are suffering. As a result, they are more aware of the campaigns about our society’s welfare.
Take the recent trend of “Recycling” on Facebook as an example. After the trend was launched by a young man, many other people have started the challenge and posted it to their Facebook. According to statistics, the large population taken part in this trend are people from the age of 18 to 28.
There has been the rise in the international volunteer programs which provide the help of young students to the areas where either residents or environment or animals are facing which poor conditions.
To conclude, it is obvious that young people are more and more caring about their surrounding environment, thanks to the development of information and technology. And this should be reserve over time.
- Task 2: Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 78
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress. What do you think the caused of this? can you suggest some possible solutions? 84
- Some People Believe That Competitive Sports, Both Team and Individual, Have No Place in the School Curriculum. How Far Do You Agree or Disagree? Give Reason for Your Answer and Include Any Relevant Examples from Your Own Knowledge or Experience. 67
- Some people believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment and only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 523, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...his information era has brought to them all of the real-time information around the world ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd are people from the age of 18 to 28. There has been the rise in the internati...
^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imals are facing which poor conditions. To conclude, it is obvious that young pe...
^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reserved'?
Suggestion: reserved
...tion and technology. And this should be reserve over time.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11784511785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96267216204 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0439455361 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156560135591 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486421645136 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344619702288 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083594570669 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343383690653 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.