We are living in an era that we can easily access many things, such as movies, just by a few clicks on our mobiles. Even though some people prefer to enjoy movies on big white screen, there are many people who uses their portables to watch movies. Although, I prefer to watch a movie on tablet as it is more convenient, depending on the movie, I would agree with the them who support going to cinema for full experience.
First and foremost, going to the cinema is expensive and time consuming. One need to pay quite a price the ticket, go to the cinema and there is a possibility that the movie is not worth both the time and money. Furthermore, some people in the saloon might be careless of the rest and use their phones during the movie or even chat about the scene which could be irritating. In contrary, depending on the movie, there is no other mean to enjoy amazing graphics, feel the sound and experience the very piece of the movie as whole. Thus, I believe, movies like Lord of The Rings is best experienced in cinemas.
On the other hand, enjoying a movie on a portable is quite enough for some. Anyone with a screen can enjoy a movie on his/her way to work, in a train trip or even next to a lake while sunsets. There are features like VOD (Video On Demand) that presents a huge movie library which can be downloaded for later or can be watched instantly. There applications are relatively cheaper than the price of a movie in cinema. Moreover, it allows user to select any type of movie, including the most recent ones.
In conclusion, thanks to the mobiles, the movie can be enjoyed anywhere, anytime but we should not forget the taste of joy for a specific movie that can only be enjoyed with fantastic sound and huge screen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...ending on the movie, I would agree with the them who support going to cinema for full ex...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45482866044 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37439589049 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4412524282 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196423767976 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697606886952 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433968505158 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125998940442 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321342884726 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.