The chart provides information on how the employment status affected men and women during a typical week in 1998-99.
It can be clearly seen, that unemployed and retired groups of people have much more hours for their own leisure than those occupied with full time and part time job or housework. Overall, according to the given chart, men enjoyed their off time on average 10 hours more than women did.
Unemployed or retired men spent about 85 hours on leisure activities per week and around 75 hours accounted for women in the same groups. Compared to this, employed full-time men and women enjoyed less leisure time. 50 hours per week for men and just under 40 for women.
Almost the same numbers, 40 hours for leisure time, were indicted for those women employed part-time, which is 10 hours less than housewives, who spent around 50 hours for enjoying their leisure time.
- The graphs below show the Expenditure on Heath Education UAE as percentage of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy 63
- Leisure time in a typical week: by sex and employment status, 1998-99 73
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 56
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, similarly, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98717948718 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61601299641 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7230143915 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293100536811 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160901241633 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872749436743 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222403031548 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724510804535 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.