The bar chart illustrates the proportion of male and female, who are involved in regular physical activity in Australia in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of male and female, who are involved in regular physical activity in Australia in 2010.
Overall, the percentage of women who did regular physical work exceeded the figures for men of all ages except for people aged between 15 and 24. The figures were almost similar for people over 65.
In 2010, the number of men involved in physical activities were more with nearly 52% compared to women with nearly 45, who aged from 15 to 34 years. The figures for both male and female were similar for people, who were aged over 65 just below 50. It is interesting to note that the elderly people work in almost same proportion.
The other significant categories are people aged between 34-34, 24-89, 324-29, where women were involved more than half per cent compared to men and the figures ranged between 49-22. The other category is people in late twenties and early thirties, where women did more physical activity with just below 50, compared to me
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | SaranyaJeevesh | 61 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- the changes made in a university office in 2005 and the current year. 67
- The line graph depicts the amount of spreads namely Margarine, low fat & reduced spreads, and butter consumed between 1981 and 2007. 78
- The table illustrates the data about the forest area in millions of hectares in six different continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005. 73
- The line graph depicts the proportion of tourists to England who visited Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier, and Festival between 1980 to 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84705882353 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30164677018 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4112927979 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289349910163 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176587759537 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.315149824066 0.0843802449381 373% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318375187092 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.39501085385 0.0819641961636 482% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.