The pie charts below show the proportion graduate with science degree and art degree in a company in 1990 and 2010.
The pie chart demonstrate how figures for graduates with different degrees of science and art in a company changed within 2 decades from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the proportion of PhD science graduates was lowest throughout the period. It is clear that significant changes could be observed in Master-Art, First Degree-science and first degree art figures.
In 1990, 25% of employees in a company had Master-art degree while only 18 % had first degree science and art. But in the next 2 decades, the pattern reversed with the proportions of graduates with frist degree science and art rising up to 27% and 24% respectively while that of Master-art ones decreased by 10%.
When it comes to other graduates of other degrees, PHD-Art and Master science graduates accounted for 12% and 20% of the total share in 1990 but saw the similar reduction rate of 3% in 2010. Additionally, there was hardly any change in the PHD science category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | grahamoneil | 85 | view |
- The charts show the reasons why undergraduates and postgraduates choose to go to Parker University. Describe the difference and compare them if possible. 78
- Most societies have their homeless people Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money To what extent do you agree 70
- The table below gives information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008. 59
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.gree? 61
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...the proportion of PhD science graduates was lowest throughout the period. It is clear that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99363057325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79460303457 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9359094067 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524060431454 0.215688989381 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24280431204 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129715633753 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334679253218 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118076352242 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.