The pie charts below show the proportion graduate with science degree and art degree in a company in 1990 and 2010.
The pie chart demonstrate how figures for graduates with different degrees of science and art in a company changed within 2 decades from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the proportion of PhD science graduates was lowest throughout the period. It is clear that significant changes could be observed in Master-Art, First Degree-science and first degree art figures.
In 1990, 25% of employees in a company had Master-art degree while only 18 % had first degree science and art. But in the next 2 decades, the pattern reversed with the proportions of graduates with frist degree science and art rising up to 27% and 24% respectively while that of Master-art ones decreased by 10%.
When it comes to other graduates of other degrees, PHD-Art and Master science graduates accounted for 12% and 20% of the total share in 1990 but saw the similar reduction rate of 3% in 2010. Additionally, there was hardly any change in the PHD science category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | grahamoneil | 85 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Fashion has become more and more important when people choose clothes Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 85
- Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations not of poorer nations. Do you agree with this opinion. 78
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...the proportion of PhD science graduates was lowest throughout the period. It is clear that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99363057325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79460303457 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9359094067 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524060431454 0.215688989381 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24280431204 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129715633753 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334679253218 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118076352242 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.