The pie charts illustrates the proportion of energy consumption of the UK in two years.
The gernal overview here is that in 2000 the UK consume coal the most they spent of 30% according to 2010. It is clear that is similarities percentage.
It can be seen that solar has been rose up from 6.5% to 10% in 2010. Moreover, other energy were climbed up 4% from 5% to 9%.
On the other hand, petrol had been dropped 9% in 2010. To compare with gas they were 29%. However, in 2010 gas has went up only 5%.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Sagarjango
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 22
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy consumption of the UK in two years. The gernal overview here is that in 2000...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lear that is similarities percentage. It can be seen that solar has been rose ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgy were climbed up 4% from 5% to 9%. On the other hand, petrol had been dropp...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...they were 29%. However, in 2010 gas has went up only 5%.
^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, in 2010 gas has went up only 5%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 409.0 965.302439024 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 97.0 196.424390244 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.21649484536 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.13828899271 3.73543355544 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32258683537 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 64.0 106.607317073 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659793814433 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 112.5 283.868780488 40% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0258007461 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 51.125 112.824112599 45% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.125 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103109103319 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474159395134 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105095958175 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884437474284 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134834211355 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 4.5 13.2329268293 34% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.14 61.2550243902 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.3 10.3012195122 32% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.31 11.4140731707 55% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.