A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
It is common belief that having a mixture of nationalities allows a country to develop more quickly and make it more interesting. In my perspective, I completely agree this view for many reasons.
One of the most worth-mentioning reason is multicultural. When people who is from foreign countries immigrate to a country like the USA, they also take their culture into one. This can lead to a various lifestyles which reflect their characteristics. That can make people more exciting and freedom to choose what things are suitable for them. For example, people live in highly diversity area, they can easier to choose traditional cuisine that they like. Moreover, they can talk different people in their communities, thereby improving their ability to communicate more effectively in a variety of contexts.
Another reason why I hold this view is advantages for local companies. It can be seen that each ethnic group have different strengths. Indeed, if a company need to overcomes some problems that they face in the market, they should aggregate all opinions. As a result, each person can give a comment which base on their experiences, including the strengths in their culture. Following that, the manager can easier to analysis what it can solve for each problem. Furthermore, in order to spread products or services to other countries, the corporate would ask their staff who was born and raise in these countries about life and culture. By doing it, the can understand local citizen, making logical strategy in their business plan.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that a combination immigrants from nationalities can provides many benefits for a country. This is due to the abundant life it creates and help local people develop their economic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Mampee | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 11 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on thi 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 89
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 67
- People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasingly early age. Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example.Discuss the c 67
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lifestyle'?
Suggestion: lifestyle
...re into one. This can lead to a various lifestyles which reflect their characteristics. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'overcome'.
Suggestion: overcome
...strengths. Indeed, if a company need to overcomes some problems that they face in the mar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18947368421 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91661060492 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6849761916 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145195664397 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492785529599 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472163206972 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103063376573 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553193490603 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.