The two maps show the developments which small fishing village and surrounding area experienced over a period of 30 years between 1974 and 2004.
Overall, it can be seen that the comparison of two maps reveal a change from small fishing village to a large European tourist resort.
In 1973, the village was a small rural place but for the next 30 year village witnessed dramatic changes. The most noticeable change was at the coast where harbor was demolished to give a way to beaches that extended along the coast. Then on the south-west side the extension of hotels was built near the coast side. All trees in woodland were cut down to make a room for gold course.
At the central area olive bushes were cut down in order to make a way for farmland where fruits and vegetables were grown in order to supply hotels with food. Small village that was originally located right to the next of woodland and olives was extended to the northern-west side and new tourist shops were built there. There was built a stretch on new road from coastal to the small village on the east side of area.
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past.Why is this case?Is it positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that children should be given lessons on how to manage money in the school.Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier.Why is this?Is this the best solution to traffic congestion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49418604651 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24218943596 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1556274235 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136312488003 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674114099125 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712419863937 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109285461106 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420997688193 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.