The passage states that three prominent advantages of professors appearing on Television(TV) news programs. These are benefit to professors reputation, publicity of universities and public gaining knowledge about from real experts. However, the speaker disagrees by stating several cons about professors appearing on TV programs and elaborates on it.
On benefits to professors, the passage says that professors acquire good reputation as academic scholars, the speaker counters it by stating some other opinion. He says that professors appearing on TV tend to form a narrative among fellows that they are entertainers and not serious educators. Also, they do not get invites for conferences and money for their researches if they appear on TV.
Additionally, the speaker disproves passage on university benefits. He states that professors who appear on TV might have difficulty managing time for university, students and campus related issues while the passage mainly focuses just on publicity and reputation.
Finally, on public gains, the speaker refutes the passage by saying that TV networks do not want in depth material rather they want more entertainment. They want movie version of literature and sciences which viewers and audiences can already watch in full length movies.
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 86
- #65 Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 85
- Hydroelectricity integrated essay 42
- Superpower food -integrated food 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an already watch in full length movies.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62051282051 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92124999138 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9660124242 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1859401585 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765834341723 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503440563993 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106916126289 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421731909891 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.