for school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of children’s intelligence and social skills are built by a wide variety of factor and other people around, especially their tutors and parents. Some people argue that teachers are more important to students’ development of intelligence and social knowledge than their mother and father. I disagree with this view, I believe that students’ outstanding performance and social development are affected by their parents rather than ones’ teachers.
Some individuals put forward the view that teachers can make more significant contributions to the intelligence and social improvement of school children than their relatives. Firstly, tutors can have positive impacts on pupils’ outstanding performance. In particular, during the learning process, teachers can provide their students with a number of useful tips and a piece of advice which can help pupils gain more impressive examination results. In addition, the young generation can cultivate social skills by helping and guidance from their tutors. For example, in national history lessons, students can be taught a great deal of knowledge of history events which happened in various ancient periods. As a result, they could improve social knowledge such as their national culture and respect it as well as their ancients.
I am convinced that parents seem to be more important than teachers to children’s intelligence and social development. Firstly, parents can be forces to reinforce the intelligence of their kids. For instance, they sometimes can present their babies a prize when children achieve a high examination result, which can make students try them best in the learning process. Furthermore, parents can play a major role in students’ social development. In fact, they spend far more time with their children than any individual teacher is able to do. Therefore, they can monitor the activities of children outside school hours, at the weekend and during holiday and teach them how to behave properly like showing respect toward elders or proper behaviours in public.
In conclusion, some people think that teachers are the main factor contributing to children’s intelligence and social development. However, I argue that parents have more impacts on the development of students’ intelligence and social than individual tutors.
- for school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 90
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 84
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?. 67
- The world would be a much poorer place without colour To what extent would you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6581920904 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14590481407 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497175141243 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1185958142 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.823529412 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5294117647 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393351620066 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15284230688 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875011591167 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268607897545 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480227900157 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.