The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007
The graphs give information about how many people in countries and urban areas were influenced by four kinds of noise contamination during daytime and nighttime in 2007.
In general, it is clear that people in cities were affected by noise pollution rather than in rural areas. In both charts, traffic is the main class in all time.
Particularly, traffic noise in cities impact 64 million and 48 million people in the day and night, respectively, while that in countries were respective 34 million and 24 million, as a half as that in cities. Besides, the number of people in cities affected by train noise in daytime and nighttime was 10 million and 8 million, respectively, more than 2 million in rural regions.
The remaining two reasons for noise emission, namely aircraft and industry were a dramatic decrease in the day and night. Specifically, just 10 million people were influenced by aircraft noise in cities and 8 million in rural regions in the day; while in the night, aircraft noise in urban and countries areas was the same, just 1 million people. Especially, nobody in countries was affected by noise from the industry at all time; however, the number of people were impacted by industrial noise were just 1 million and 0.25 million in the day and night, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-13 | ladungkiet | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 39
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 84
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 56
- the tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 56
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives, but few people achieve it.What are the causes of the problems?How to overcome it? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72341114573 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449541284404 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0827250576 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357334437901 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181145158631 0.084324248473 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880647713232 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230229582489 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417176747711 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.