Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete.
The statement is true considering the way the environment is being used today for many purposes like industrialization, household, etc. The policies and the regulations though amended but they are not analyzed and implemented, the reason is they are amended after a considerable loss has been done to the environment. If the pollution which is spread in many different forms is considered then though having rules in place, the implementation of the same is very difficult as the population is also increasing day by day. If these problems were addressed long back when the side effects of pollution just started blooming, then many of the potential environmental threats could be prevented.
If the current regulations are seen, then there is a lack of analysis that has been done before putting these rules into implementation. If the CFCs are considered which is a huge threat to the Ozone layer which is very important for survival against harmful UV rays, then the problems arised by CFCs were addressed after a long time the CFC generators were introduced. If the forecast was appropriate then we could have handled this situation in a very different manner which would reduce any harmful environmental effects.
To keep the policies in conformance to the issues, well developed research team needs to be implemented which can forecast any threats to the nature with as little information as available. Not only pollution, if the urbanization is to be considered, then it is a huge sacrifice to the nature which needs to uproot many trees, that means key component of environment i.e. greenery is diminished. Many rules and policies do exist which needs compliance of environmental safety, but the main question is are they very stringent, or are those policies amended having a forecast to the future.
Environmental regulations should consider the minimal information that is available and have policies that prevents any possible threats in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-16 | pasomaiya | 50 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | vsn1541997 | 83 | view |
| 2017-01-12 | bhaskarvemuri18 | 50 | view |
| 2017-01-12 | bhaskarvemuri18 | 16 | view |
| 2016-10-04 | cybertelic | 83 | view |
- Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete. 50
- Poor decisions are made by those who think emotionally and justify their emotional decisions with a fake logic. 58
- "The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. " 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nt. If the pollution which is spread in many different forms is considered then though having ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...onmental threats could be prevented. If the current regulations are seen, then ...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...utting these rules into implementation. If the CFCs are considered which is a huge...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ime the CFC generators were introduced. If the forecast was appropriate then we co...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ime the CFC generators were introduced. If the forecast was appropriate then we co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19811320755 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07087185432 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51572327044 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5648887133 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12906973396 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573836658509 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637205798383 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106093964626 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722040372575 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.