People doing different jobs enjoy different amount of holiday time. Should people have the same holiday time? Give your opinion?
It is seldom argued that professionals with differentiated profiles across vast industry types are benefiting with larger vacation types as compared to workers with meager roles. In my opinion, organisations with flat structure have more sustainable future and every colleague should be offered with similar holiday time. This essay will discuss merits for the same.
Firstly, by providing equal holiday opportunity, across all levels and with holiday planning will lead to healthy work-life balance among colleagues. This would create foundation for culture of respect and equal treatment in the company. Thus, it would lead the organisation in driving realistic results and better performance management. To cite an example, according to research by Tata Motors, human resource department, after following equal leave policy across all levels in the first half of financial year, company saw a 68% decline in manager-subordinate conflict as compared with last year levels.
Secondly, emoluments like providing equal holidays can help in reducing the sickness levels and can consequently improve employee attendance in a complete financial year. When one is equally rested, then only he/she can contribute to the organisation's success. This in turn also helps in setting benchmarks for the competition. Companies offering employee friendly benefits of equal vacation time attracts quality talent pool and thus flourish in long-run. For instance, Zara, a fashion retailer has the highest retention percentage in the competitive Indian retail industry due to their fair holiday policy.
To conclude, workers should enjoy similar holiday and leave periods that will enhance their productivity. And these rest time will fuel better outputs. Thus, its viable to provide similar holiday plan for everyone.
- Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting (travelling to work), parks and gardens close to city center should be replaced by apartment building for commuters to live in. However, others disagree with this.Discuss both vi 73
- Successful companies use advertising to make more sales. What can make an advertising very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society? 56
- Some people believe in the era of e-technology, printing newspapers and magazines will cease to occur in the near future .To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Scientists believe that in order to protect the environment people must use less energy in their daily lives However most people have not changed the way they live Why do you think many people have not taken individual action What could be done to encoura 72
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to customers. Some people think it would be better for the environment and economy if people only eat the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble future and every colleague should be offered with similar holiday time. This ...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing equal leave policy across all levels in the first half of financial year, com...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness levels and can consequently improve employee attendance in a complete financ...
^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
... then only he/she can contribute to the organisations success. This in turn also helps in set...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72862453532 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87673740226 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0843830608 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143042454738 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495671672172 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530675910482 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955508296241 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445667408163 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.