People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?

Nowadays, it is a fact that there are a variety of issues residents populating in big cities have to suffer in their daily life. In this essay, I will discuss some of these problems and some solutions governments should take to promote citizens to change their home to other towns before giving a reasoned conclusion.

Let’s begin by looking at some problems people have to cope when living in big cities. One of the major issues is that environmental pollution has negative impacts on human health. Industrialized cities have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of factories and companies, which leads to the increasing emission of carbon dioxide in the environment and harming the health of citizens. Another issue is that people without qualifications always face unemployment. This is because companies always tend to choose seniors rather than juniors who lack related certifications. For example, my high school friend has decided to find a part-time job because of his low level of qualifications.

However, to deal with these problems, governments should take some measures to encourage to move to other regions. Firstly, governments should move some universities, hospitals and companies to neighbouring towns, which leads to the movement of staffs and their family members. Secondly, road and accommodation systems should be constructed by governments and authorities to meet the essential needs of residents. Basic conditions becoming more convenient would attract more people, particularly workers with a low level of salary. Take my family is a good example. We are likely to afford my accommodation on outskirt with only half of the amount of money spent on buying a small apartment in the city centre.

In conclusion, citizens will face health and individual problems if they go on living in big cities and some measures should be taken by governments to tackle these issues. In my perspective, these problems will be worse unless governments and individuals join hands to address.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: moving
... should take some measures to encourage to move to other regions. Firstly, governments ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.315625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0328137075 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7053403423 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270618525916 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766082951413 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697069397397 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159502599403 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442138087381 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.