Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
In this modern era, over packaging of products have become a norm. Some might argue that it's the responsibility of consumers to strictly avoid over packaged products, whereas others believe that the producers are responsible for over packaging. This essay will discuss why producers should mainly be liable for over the top packaging.
Over packaged products results in higher cost which directly affects the buyer. If producers reduce the amount of unnecessary materials used in packaging then price of the product will automatically decrease, which would directly benefit the consumers. For instance, all food joints use paper bag and paper sheet to pack the items which significantly reduces the price as compared to a box. When looking at this example, it's evident that reducing the packaging on a product where is not needed have direct benefits to consumers and producers should understand this.
Other than the fact that over packaging raises the price, it also produces garbage which negatively impacts our environment. Extensive waste puts an extra amount of pressure on our garbage disposable system and we end up dumping them in sea or land which results in different kind of pollution. For example, extensive dumping of garbage has pushed many species to extinction or made them deformed. Therefore, producers should avoid over packaging.
This analyses establishes that less packaging of products not only reduces the cost but it also save the environment, hence mutually beneficial for consumers and producers. I believe it's the responsibility of the producers to not waste money in over packaging as it doesn't have any effect on product's performance and it will be a good step in the direction of saving the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- In our education system assessments are done through formal written examination. Do you think it is still valid? 80
- Company's top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss. 77
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 85
- Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. What is the recent invention that you encountered? Discuss it's advantages and disadvantages. 85
- Roles of governments, companies and individuals to combat climate change. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ve become a norm. Some might argue that its the responsibility of consumers to stri...
^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'establish'.
Suggestion: establish
...avoid over packaging. This analyses establishes that less packaging of products not onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...s not only reduces the cost but it also save the environment, hence mutually benefic...
^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... for consumers and producers. I believe its the responsibility of the producers to ...
^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...not waste money in over packaging as it doesnt have any effect on products performance...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...ckaging as it doesnt have any effect on products performance and it will be a good step ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28417266187 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82193499502 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557553956835 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0939203746 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360914730538 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149424427744 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106846593742 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236224420897 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860264142364 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.