The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph illustrate the reasons why people in Nepal ride bicycle to work and also why people prefer car for going to there work.
In the bar graph we can see that the percentage of people using bicycle are more health conscious where as people with car prefer more comfort for going to there work with the percentage of 30% and 40% respectively.
Firstly, we can see that population of people is less by 30% comparing to people using car. It can be seen that by driving car people can reach there work 14% faster than by using bicycle. But people using bicycle saves up to 12% of there money. Although it save money driving in car provides safety and security comparing to cycling by 11%.
Therefore, it is seen that people using cycle for there work are more healthy and they are saving lot of money comparing to people using vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | Rihav Raj Acharya | 41 | view |
- Transport preferred among young people from different countries 58
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads .To what extend do you agree and disagree with this statement? 56
- many government thinks that economic progress i their mot imoprtant goal. some people,however thinks that other type of progress are equally important for a country. 56
- online sales for electronics & appliance, food and beverage, home furnishings and video game in Canada from the year 2005 and 2010. 38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...using bicycle are more health conscious where as people with car prefer more comfort for...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...s up to 12% of there money. Although it save money driving in car provides safety an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56493506494 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21340958407 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1061750884 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208599472282 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114216488565 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066278268807 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150941618258 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678005614758 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.