The chart compares the proportion of the global population in four nations in two years 1950 and 2002, and also predictions for 2050.
It is clear from the table that China and India have the highest proportions of the population in three years. Additionally, the figure for Japan is by far the lowest during the research period.
In 1950, the rate of the population in China was highest, at around 23%, while the figure for India was slightly lower, at 15%. About 7% of people in the world were from the USA, compared to only less than 5% from Japan. In 2002, the percentage of the Indian population rose slowly to approximately 17%, while China, the USA and Japan all witnessed declines in their figures.
In 2050, it is predicted that the percentage of the Indian population will increase to nearly 20% and become the highest figure compared to other countries. By contrast, the population proportions of China and Japan are projected to decrease to 15% and about 2% respectively. In the same year, the figure for the USA is likely to remain the same, at 5%.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 67
- the advantages and disadvantages of the learning English in Vietnam 82
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050. 67
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60580943019 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2355976211 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249175509678 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100542051081 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834449377639 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168487489272 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940631405979 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.