A glance at the line chart provided reveals the comparison between visitors travel in to and from the UK within two decades, while the bar chart illustrates the five countries most visited by the UK residents in 1999.
Overall, the trend of traveling has been increasing during the period, and the number of visitors from the UK was larger than those to the UK. In 1999, the most popular country visited by UK residents was France.
Regarding the line chart, at the beginning of the researching years, the number of people traveled abroad and to the UK was much the same, at 10 million and approximately 12 million respectively. Over the decades, the difference between them saw a larger increase. By 1999, the number of travelers going abroad was twofold than those going to the UK with over 50 million and just over 25% respectively.
In 1999, France experienced the largest number of visitors from the UK at over 10 million. Followed by Spain and the USA. An interesting point highlighted by the figure is that UK travelers to Turkey had the least number of people which was almost one fifth compared to France.
- Nowadays it is easy to apply for and be given a credit card However some people experience problems when they are not be able to pay their debts back In your opinion do the advantages of credit cards outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarize the in formation by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81443298969 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64191224059 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9521672603 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252179943573 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124424818416 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125844922514 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19431947723 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10397781135 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.