In nearly all science courses at university, there are significantly more male students than female students. What is the reason for this? What could be done to balance out the numbers?
Men’s education has always been superior than women’s education. Due to this, a comparatively larger number of male candidates can be seen in most of the courses at colleges than female. What is causing this behaviour? What could be the possible alternatives to reduce this imbalance? An extensive scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
Although we have had confronted an abundance of issues and their remedies until now, in this case, I would like to put forward a balanced ergo objective assessment. I opine, there are some unavoidable causes for the phenomenon, furthermore, we can see a few of the viable solutions to the identified causes. The subsequent two paragraphs will detail both aspects extensively.
The foremost cause is male dominating culture around the globe. People provide financial support and permissions only to young boys for higher education. Hence, the boys can obtain plenty of opportunities and motivation from surroundings. Apart from that, girls are always considered responsible for household activities and taking care of children’s. As a consequence, they are not only discouraged but also asked to sacrifice their dreams to handle household chores. For instance, from the Cambridge University’s published article, it is seen that even though the number of educated girls has been increasing substantially, the difference of boys against girls for tertiary education is still huge.
A possible resolution for the above challenges is initiatives from the Government. The law enforcement agencies must arrange some women educational campaigns to motivate people and change their perspective regarding girls' tertiary education. Additionally, the Government of all countries must provide scholarships for women. Scholarships are a great alternative for the financial support they require in early days. For instance, the report from the World Education Services says that the scholarships provided for women made a noticeable positive impact on the count of graduate and post-graduate girls.
Keeping all previously mentioned facts in mind, men dominance and disrespectful treatment are obvious components of our reality. On the other hand, approaches such as motivation through educational campaigns and commercial support by the Government could play a pivotal role. To conclude, there are sufficient demonstrations for the critical problems, however, some adequate measures for the resolution of challenges.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-22 | oyondev007 | 87 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. 73
- In nearly all science courses at university there are significantly more male students than female students What is the reason for this What could be done to balance out the numbers 73
- Professional sports people are often idolised by young children. Some people think that they, therefore, have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children. Do you agree or disagree? 62
- In many countries, women no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...os;s education has always been superior than women's education. Due to this, a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, apart from, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73783783784 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25513697523 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2716127491 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177041453359 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524208982945 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630026173424 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971605764731 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793093122916 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.