Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
The staggering progress of societies in today’s convoluted world is clear to everyone, and it is erected upon strong underpinning: social behavior. In this respect, the establishing relationship with disparate people is an issue of broad interest to the general public. Some people believe that it is conceivable to make friends with intelligent people. While some others stand at the other extreme, holding the view that a good sense of humor should be greatly considered to make friends. I side with the latter idea; the following paragraphs lend credence to my view.
First and foremost, what provokes people to make friends with humorous people is that these individuals provide you a good, desirable ambient. With no shadows of doubt, people who spend most of their time laughing and joking have more positive moral, cultivating them benefit from unfettered enjoyments. In the meantime, making friend with funny individuals take precedence over other characteristics such as intelligence on the assumption that people can surmount hurdles and problems with more benign, beneficial methods. That is to say, life is rife with vicissitudes and dealing with humorous people culminates in having the endogenous revolution of those have been suffering from discomfort and distress. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, those needs for food, healthcare, and shelter are among the basic. After these targets are attained, people tend to higher aspirations; entertainment and inclination. I this regard, not only is a sense of humor the invaluable blessings of inherent features of bodies, but it also would be considered as a panacea for all strata, from all walk of life.
What is more, by coping with enjoyable people, people can alleviate their self-confidence, providing them an atmosphere to improve their capabilities, not getting upset or distress by miscellaneous jokes. To elucidate more on this issue, making friends with people having a sense of humor turns introverted individual to extroverted, giving them more self-esteem. In this respect, they can make their potential flourish across the board in terms of sociability. Based on the aforementioned example, people, in the higher level of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, obtain more redeeming features called self-actualization. Therefore, they are inspired to be more sociable in their life day in day out. So beneficial is the role of a humorous friend that help others blossom their talent. An example can drive this concept home. Many studies have made it clear that spending time with funny people help them activate their right hemisphere brain, showing their inclination to be more creative and innovative in routine life. Should individuals take advantage of their funny friends, they can improve their abilities mentally.
To wrap it up, I have reiterated my standpoint that people with a good sense of humor outweigh those of intelligent. This is because friends can have more joyful time, and people can alleviate their self-confidence as their capabilities are soared in the aftermath of dealing with funny individuals.
- TPO44 73
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- TPO44 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 76
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (5-10 years old)?1-being helpful2-Being honest3-Being well organized 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...le is an issue of broad interest to the general public. Some people believe that it is conceiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, such as, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2639.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4412371134 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05319403833 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527835051546 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8060794526 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.739130435 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52173913043 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3948119438 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127773649027 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117527689549 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286794474279 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884589667799 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.