Some people think that all university students should study whatever
they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study
subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to
science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whilst some people may believe that tertiary students should be given freedom to select their study progrommes of their interests, others, including myself, are of the belief that graduating from scientific or technological institutions is much more beneficial if they are keen on securing a decent job in the future. Both views will be discussed thoroughly before a reasoned conclusion will be reached.
On the one hand, it might be said that if students are left free to decide on which study programs to enroll in according to their desires and talents, they will most probably excel and outperform others because they would likely be more creative and innovative. For example, a friend of mine who was gifted painter since being a child, joined the Faculty of Fine Arts in Cairo University and refused to join the Faculty of Medicine, despite the fact that he was qualified to do so, and he met all pre-requisites. As a result, he is now one of the most famous painters not only in Egypt but also worldwide. Despite this story of a successful figure, it is not the rule; it is just an exception as many of art, drama, music graduates end up unfortunately jobless.
On the other hand, graduates from Engineering, Medicine, Information Technology (IT) faculties have mostly no issue at all to get a well-paid job in prestigious establishments in any country the world over. Factories, power and industrial plants, oil and gas or mining companies are a few instances out of many other businesses which heavily depend on such highly educated workforce. According to a research conducted by ‘The Economist’ in 2018, unemployment rates amongst IT fresh graduated engineers in the USA were less 5 times than that reported for their counterparts who graduated from Music or Drama institutes. This emphasises that by having a degree from a scientific academy, job opportunities’ availability and sustainability are anticipated to be far higher.
In conclusion, having looked at both sides of this debate, it can be reiterated that while following one’s desires and innate talents seems to be quitely attractive abstract, a degree in the field of science or technology has been proven to be a more beneficial and realistic option for students’ foreseeable future.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. You have lost an item of value on a train. Write a letter to the railway company. In your letter • describe the item • explain where and when you left it • say what action you would like the company to 84
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries.What are the advantage and disadvantages of this? 84
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to countries where they cannot be grown or are out of season.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 84
- 9. Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest time of most people’s lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibility.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whateverthey like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to studysubjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related toscience and technology.Discuss both these views and 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee in the field of science or technology has been proven to be a more beneficial ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16085790885 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13148435273 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611260053619 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1139240083 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9090909091 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24887736359 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866454262586 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824612645301 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154405063167 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895951318581 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.