TOEFL TPO 09- Integrated Writing Task
The passage discusses automobile's main source of power and says that there is a promising replacement for internal-combustion engine. The promising alternative is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell. The passage provides three reasons for supporting its idea. However, the professor describes that hydrogen fuel cell is not a practical solution to solve the polution problem. So, the passage refutes all the passage's reasons by three reasons.
First, the reading claims that internal-combustion engines are relied on petroleum. There is a catastrophic problem about petroleum base fuels. Petroleum is a limited source and one day it will be finished. While the talk asserts that providing pure hydrogen for manufacturing hydrogen-based fuel is not an easy process and it needs a lot of advanced equipments such as a device that produce cold temperature. Also, fabricating these complex equipment is somewhat impractical.
Second, the text contends that hydrogen-based fuels are very attractive because it seems they can solve world's pollution problem. However, the lecture rejects this idea by explaining that manufacturing pure hydrogen increase the pollution because the purification procedures need to burn a lot of petroleum fuel. As yo can see, the hydrogen-based fuels are not very environment friendly.
Third the passage suggests that fuel-cell engines will be replaced by ancient engines because they are cost effective in comparison with the old ones. But, the professor rebutes this idea by describing that hydrogen-based fuels need to materials loke Pt and this material is very expensive. So, the cost effectiveness of hydrogen-based fuel engines is a elusion! As a result, the text's idea is not correct.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 85
- TPO 42 independent writing 3
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scusses automobiles main source of power and says that there is a promising repla...
^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...native is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell. The passage provides three reasons for supp...
^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eness of hydrogen-based fuel engines is a elusion! As a result, the texts idea is...
^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'texts'' or 'text's'?
Suggestion: texts'; text's
... engines is a elusion! As a result, the texts idea is not correct.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56704980843 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33950193307 2.5805825403 129% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3475726335 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470924759053 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155266411592 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101380007941 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277202711373 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369557591357 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.