Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped.
To what extend do you agree?
Financial subject is the backbone of every country and amplify that is the main purpose for those countries which want to become one of the advanced countries in the world. Some people believe that, this growing may hurt the nature by their wrong effect and should be restricted, while others think differently. They think this rising is necessary for countries. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the former view before arriving at conclusion.
It is obvious that profitable growing has direct relation with industry. It means that, because of modern and well industry, countries can develop on financial and this progress on manufacturing is dangerous for providing elementary materials, humans need to demolish environment. For instance, they should destroy jungles for wood, as well as mountain for coal. Hence, industry growth causes economic growth and cut the rate of poor people on society while the environment gradually will be collapsed. For financial growing government need to build highways, buildings and bridges. For these kinds of construction, they should destroy lands and animal’s habitation. In reality they hurt the ecosystem and wild life.
On the other hands, in some people opinion with decreasing poverty in society the security and welfare will be increased. On the other words, well financial situation for citizenry may reduce criminals and rise satisfaction in countries. Furthermore, rich countries have powerful army and reliable military force. They have new and modern war equipment, and can protect of their native land and compatriots. They believe it is more important than environment in these days.
At the conclusion, we should know that we have just an earth and it is not recurring. It is not good reason that for having well financial condition we can destroy all thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-28 | Amir Nazaripoor | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | Amir Nazaripoor | 87 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. The say that the only way to increase recycle is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 78
- Some people say that in all level of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.•Do you agree or disagree? 56
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes thereWhat is your opinion about this? 73
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely.How important do you think letter writing is? Do you thin letter writi 58
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility.discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28903654485 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73606143261 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5613855091 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103739470917 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315508801385 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463802436052 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602850000471 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259565526342 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.