The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrates the proportion of water usage by various sectors in Sydney,Australia in 1997 and 2007.
Overall , after 10 years, the most common usage was for food industry and the least was for building industry.While there was a downward trend of food industry, this city saw upward trends of manufacturing and household use.
Looking at the year 1997, the percentage for food industry was 48 percent which was the highest and the second highest belonged to domestic usage with 19 percent . The figures for manufacturing and service industry were not slightly different with 13 and 15 percent respectively.Sydney saw the lowest percentage of water used by building industry with 5 percent.
Moving to 2007,Food industry still remained as the highest data but it dropped by 7 percent .Sydney witnessed a considerable rise in manufacturing with 25 percent and a minimal by 2 percent in household use. There were insignificant reductions in building industry and service industry with from 3 to 4 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Drragkloha | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Lucy_067 | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | tuanly | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- the results of a research which examines the average percentage marks secured by boys and girls of different ages in several School subjects are given below 80
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010. 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Australia
...water usage by various sectors in Sydney,Australia in 1997 and 2007. Overall , after 10 ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey,Australia in 1997 and 2007. Overall , after 10 years, the most common usage w...
^^
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...and the least was for building industry.While there was a downward trend of food indu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...longed to domestic usage with 19 percent . The figures for manufacturing and servi...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sydney
...ent with 13 and 15 percent respectively.Sydney saw the lowest percentage of water used...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by building industry with 5 percent. Moving to 2007,Food industry still remai...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...highest data but it dropped by 7 percent .Sydney witnessed a considerable rise in ...
^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sydney
...ghest data but it dropped by 7 percent .Sydney witnessed a considerable rise in manufa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20731707317 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20771678058 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2457205227 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123662004793 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861480658989 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943555694811 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11015206077 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102859137266 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.