The pie charts illustrate the proportion of total water consumption by 5 factors in Sydney, Australia during the period of 10 years from 1997 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the food industry consumed the largest amount of total water usage. Moreover, the percentage of total water used by the service industry in 2007 was almost double the figure for 1997. Units are measured in percentage.
During a decade, food industry saw a slight decline of 7%, from 48% in 1997 to 41% in 2007. Manufacturing and building industry also witnessed a decline in the percentage of total water consumption. The total amount of water used by the former in 2007 was 4% lower than that in 1997, whereas the figure for the latter merely decreased from 5% to 2%.
On the contrary, there are two sectors experienced an increase in the proportion of total water usage. Service industry accounted for 25% of the total water used, almost twice as the figure for 1997, at 13%. It was followed by household use, which experienced a slight increase of 3% to reach 21% in 2007.
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 73
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 73
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er merely decreased from 5% to 2%. On the contrary, there are two sectors e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76756756757 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58287895499 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2104149284 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192709164274 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845331227042 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543803813604 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138575766699 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292736325944 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.