Some people believe that governments should make investment in building public libraries in every town, while others think it is a waste of money because we have access to information via Internet. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
In this state-of-the-art century, all infomation can be searched in the Internet. However, whether should we read online or build more public libraries using governmental subsidies has caused heated debate. While acquiring knowledge or searching information through Internet really brings us numerous benefits, I would argue that we should also allocate to the maintenance of public libraries.
On the one hand, public usage of libraries is much lower than the past due to the development of digitization. With the development of computer technology, people can search the knowledge that they want to acquire via database or read e-books by electronic devices. Moreover, viewed from the angle of economics, funding public libraries is less important than subsidizing for other fields as most libraries are free to all. For instance, facilities in education and medical need to be constantly updated in order to improve studying and working efficiencies .
On the other hand, I strongly believe that the value of public libraries cannot be underestimated. Public libraries contain a wide range of materials available to readers. Apparently, not all the books can be digitized particularly those old books and a variety of audiovisual materials can also be borrowed for free. In addition, public libraries is helpful in connecting communities. People go to the libraries not only for reading but also communicating purposes. In particular, many individuals come there to exchange information, gain knowledge as well as skills. Thus, libraries’ existence is of necessity.
In conclusion, despite the convenience of computer technology, public libraries deserve protection and maintenance because they embody the cultural identity of a place. In modern era of digitization, we should think over how libraries can exist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-02 | Mai Linh | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | fuchuanjie | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | fuchuanjie | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | fuchuanjie | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | fuchuanjie | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of main rypes of dwellinh in Victoria, the Northern Territory and Tasmania. Summarize the informationbby seleciting and reporting the main features and make comparison where revelant 78
- People nowadays change careers and place of residence very often. Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 66
- Writing, reading and maths are the three recognized traditional subjects. Computer skill should also be the fourth largest branch. Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people use distance learning programmes study material post TV the Internet etc to study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han subsidizing for other fields as most libraries are free to all. For instance,...
^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mprove studying and working efficiencies . On the other hand, I strongly believe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61231884058 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22565550629 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9761159163 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201365134095 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675817995179 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455883718134 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127261150269 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257262237999 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.