select a person to teach others based on
education
qualities of previous work
experience
here are many ways to teach other people about their duty. One way to teach them by qualified people. Although the plethora of people believe that it is important to consider a person's education and experience to select him as a teacher for others I think that it is significant to consider the quality of a person's earlier work. I feel this way because of a few reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, a person's abilities and his skills are measured by his previous work qualities. If a person is very skilled, then it is easier for him to give guidance to others. For example, a new teacher is very intelligent based on his past work. He has a P.H.D degree, so we can consider him superior to any other teacher. However, experience does not say about a person's skills, same as time is not a tool to measure one's excellence.
The second and same exquisite proof for this assertion is that a person who has done his all works very successfully, he can be the best tutor for others. If a person had gained many achievements in his career and very successfully, then he is a master to teach others. For instance, a coach has won the gold medal in badminton, so he is a master in playing badminton without any doubt. He would be best for learners rather than the experienced or educated coach.
In contrast, the person's education and his experience is also a significant factor to choose them to teach others to do their job. An educated person has more information about that. Additionally, an experienced person knows the techniques to teach people easily and very efficiently. On the other hand, if a teacher has not done quality work, then it is not worth to select him as qualified to teach others.
By the way of the conclusion, based on the above-mentioned arguments, I am of the opinion that qualities of the person's previous work are the most considerable factor to choose them to teach other people about their duty.
- generally, people live longer due to advanced technology 80
- it is better to work in group which have similar idea rather than which have different ideas than us 60
- do you agree or disagree that in modern life youngsters shoud do planning and organization 60
- Yong can not give enough time to their communities 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.use specific reasons and examples. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
here are many ways to teach other people abo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ieve that it is important to consider a persons education and experience to select him ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... significant to consider the quality of a persons earlier work. I feel this way because o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...nt based on his past work. He has a P.H.D degree, so we can consider him superior...
^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
..., same as time is not a tool to measure ones excellence. The second and same exqu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... or educated coach. In contrast, the persons education and his experience is also a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in contrast, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62285714286 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73912841791 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9606017617 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271458276663 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907861899443 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648970027526 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177282511572 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716831862012 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.