Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars.
Traffic jams can bring the entire city to a standstill. The number of cars throughout the world has soared up a multiple number of times, since the past three decades. This has turned most of the cities into 'one big traffic jam' now. For me this statement is absolutely true and this essay will further figure out, certain ways as to, how the government can dissuade the public from using their vehicles?
To embark upon, the prime reason behind my belief that world has become one big traffic jam is solely based on the premise that even if, you choose to commute for short distance by your car at any given time of the day, be it day or night you almost take double the time that you would take on moderately congested road. Be it any metropolitan city in the world. Managing the traffic has almost become the most grueling task. To illustrate, recently the latest traffic jam was cited in Beijing in China, which lasted for 12 days, a distance that could be covered in maximums three days, bringing the whole city to a halt and thus causing a lot of inconvenience to a lot of people.
Albeit, the implementation of various strategies by the government can make a big difference in reducing the traffic menace. The government can start by encouraging people to start using public transport rather use their own cars. In my belief a heavy parking charge would certainly deter the person from taking his car at least for short distances. To demonstrate the UAE government imposes a heavy parking charge. That too, on a per hour basis. This law seems to work as harsh measure against people who totally refrain from walking. These kind of deterrents have not only reduced the traffic problems but also reduce the amount of pollution
To sum up, I would like to ascertain the need to come up with stricter measures, like introducing parking charges to keep the roads traffic free and even pollution free.
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 80
- Some people believe that it is best to accept difficult situations such as having an unsatisfactory job or a lack of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept difficult situations such as having an unsatisfactory job or a lack of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...eople who totally refrain from walking. These kind of deterrents have not only reduced the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, as to, at least, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69345238095 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45450201559 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.5566102587 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302129453245 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944537373347 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653227931657 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162223976059 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105323068089 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.