A vast majority of people are of the opinion that it is a must to correct the speaker's mistake when he make. I, contrary to popular belief, contend that there is most fair ways to notify his fault. In following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples to explicate my vantage point.
One of the reasons coming to my mind at first is that it may take much more time than we expect when we want to interrupt the lecture and start a debate on teacher's fault. To shed light on this issue, when I was in New York University as an student, I remember that professor say something wrong about how we can balance a special chemical equations, as a result, my friend, Sara, initiate a controversy with the professor. It takes 20 minutes until the professor accept his mistake in this issue. Moreover, everybody become tired and finally, we left behind of our study plan for this session. Although it cause to prevent students or audience from misundrestanding, it can take much more time than we estimate.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that it might destroyed the lecturer's self-confidence. As a case in point, when I was presenting my thesis in New York University, one of the members of the committee ask me a question in the middle of my presentation, it was very confusing and I lost my concentration to continue explaining the remainder slides. This experience taught me that if somebody be interrupted by a person who is presenting a lecture especially when there are plenty of audience, this person will be totally nervous, furthermore, his hands might shake. In contrast, when you want to correct his flaw after his speech, he not only be happy but also may appreciate you because you want to help him to improve in a right way.
To wrap it up, al the aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that correcting a lecturer's mistake between his speech is not fair whether for audience's time or for the lecturer. However, that was a story in nutshell. Actually, there are other reasons and examples elaborating on this idea which are not mentioned due to the shortage of time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is be 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 83
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... people are of the opinion that it is a must to correct the speakers mistake when he ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...to correct the speakers mistake when he make. I, contrary to popular belief, contend...
^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e, when I was in New York University as an student, I remember that professor say ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'equation'?
Suggestion: equation
...t how we can balance a special chemical equations, as a result, my friend, Sara, initiate...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...tudy plan for this session. Although it cause to prevent students or audience from mi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'preventing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: preventing
...lan for this session. Although it cause to prevent students or audience from misundrestand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s experience taught me that if somebody be interrupted by a person who is presenti...
^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of audiences'.
Suggestion: plenty of audiences
...ing a lecture especially when there are plenty of audience, this person will be totally nervous, f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...because you want to help him to improve in a right way. To wrap it up, al the aforementione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74736842105 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87097906221 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560526315789 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7170010621 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.266666667 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864533228582 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290532601444 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313657731004 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528096815956 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00906459661687 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.