The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.
The maps illustrate the alterations of Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the replacement of the road which connected the south to the west of the university.
To begin with the north side of the university, the presence of new science building had converted the function of biology, chemistry and physics building in 2010. Moreover, in the south of new science building, the position of the car park and the road had been replaced by new lecture theatre in 2016. In contrast, in 2016, there was not any replacement for the position of the library, there was only an extended function of it to become library and IT Suite.
In accordance with the south part of the university, 2010 to 2016 witnessed the alterations of the footpaths which modified the place of admin building and the road in 2010, as well as the admin building was moved beside the new lecture theatre. According to the opposite of the admin building, there were a new bus station and a new café which varied the car park and the road place in previous time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | alifdores | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 78
- Line graph Income of four restaurants January to December 79
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 71
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent else whereTo what extent do you agree with this view? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74111675127 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59179684965 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492385786802 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4896102067 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185905291013 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113283915576 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176626827522 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15808358113 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136164038719 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.