The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1979 and 2000, and the marital status of adults Americans in two of the years
These two charts illustrate marriage and divorce figures as well as the marital status of Americans between 1970 and 2000. Overall, the marital status of American citizens in 2000 was not as optimistic as that of three decades ago.
According to the first graph, there were 2,5 million of marriages in both 1970 and 1980 and this figure decreased slightly during the next two decades until reaching 2 million in 2000. By comparison, the number of divorced residents in the USA first increased from 1 million in 1970 to approximately 1,4 million in 1980 but then slowly dropped back to 1 million in 2000.
As can be seen from the second bar chart, the percentage of married American adults declined by 10% from 1970 to 2000. Meanwhile, the adults who never married accounted for about 15% in 1970 and by 2000, this portion had risen by 5%. The proportion of the widowed registered a minor fall during the given period, reaching over 6% in 2000. In contrast, the percentage of divorced adults showed an upward trend between 1970 and 2000
- People nowadays change careers and place of residence very often. Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that the technology makes life complex, so we should make it simplier without usinh the technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1979 and 2000, and the marital status of adults Americans in two of the years 78
- The table below shows the percentage of main rypes of dwellinh in Victoria, the Northern Territory and Tasmania. Summarize the informationbby seleciting and reporting the main features and make comparison where revelant 78
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their study in school. What are the reasons? How can we solve this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49248252467 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.65542304 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304327019339 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144999939961 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105395532796 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221649443549 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115872785064 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.