Bar Chart : home and international students, 2010 – 2012.
The figure elucidates the number of local and global learners between 2010 and 2012. At first glance, it is evident that females experienced a significant upsurge for the total of home and international students.
To begin with males, in 2010, the amount of British home learners, which made up at just below two-thirds of 60, is higher rather than international students, which was approximately a half of 40. In the next 2 years, both aspects faced a dramatic palpitation and achieved to just under five-sixths of 30 for local students and well beyond seven-tenths of 50 for foreign learners by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with females, it has the same pattern as males where it was dominantly by local students. Regarding the number of growth which happened, 2010 to 2011 witnessed a tremendous growth for British home students and global learners in which it stood at just above a third of 90 and just less than three-fourths of 20 respectively and peaked to nine-tenths of 50 and 20 respectively, in the following years, it experienced slight progress and soared to 45 for local learners and 20 for international students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number 73
- Topic technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today In the not too distant future technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom Do you agree with this statement 84
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok. 95
- Process : Life cycle of the silkworm. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, third, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9585492228 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02037431638 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.050998279 43.030603864 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.5 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205983116263 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113480689274 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661274315757 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170899965981 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694633619863 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.