Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is irrefutable fact that teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance has become an integral and indispensable part of human’s life. While proponents are considering it as a great achievement, opponents are making their belief totally opposite to it. I firmly believe that it has plethora of merits with some demerits. I will elaborate my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, teaching principles of personal finance has many benefits to us along with our society. First and foremost, positive aspect of lessons on principles of personal finance bias has been that it makes the way of life more productive and assists in creating discipline as well as leads to numerous advancements in several fields. For instance, if financial subjects are available in university, then students perform academic experiment which discover advantages of personal finance. These lessons diminish the risk of investing in their lives because teenagers after attending these classes have the ability to consider all aspects in monetary issues. So, without these tremendous advancements of principles of personal finance, we could not be able to expect such unprecedented achievements in our life or society. Thus, it can be said that personal finance plays a vital role in each and every human’s life.
Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extent do you agree with statement.
On the contrary, like “Every rose has its thorns”, it has some disadvantages too. To cite an example, these dwellers asserted that schools and colleges should provide some practical issues. So, theoretical subject have not sufficient priority. Owing to this, it becomes biggest threat which cannot be cured effortlessly. Thus, this example clearly shows that it has various negative impacts to our life along with our society.
In conclusion after inspection upon further paragraphs, we concede that its benefits hold more water as compared to its negative externalities. As a result, principles of personal finance should be promoted in a wide range without any trouble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-14 | saqibmaqbool | 77 | view |
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. How much do you agree? 72
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 77
- creativity is born with or can be taught or improved. What is your view point? 55
- Some people believe laws can change human behavior. Do you agree with this statement? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 273, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'becomes the biggest'.
Suggestion: becomes the biggest
... sufficient priority. Owing to this, it becomes biggest threat which cannot be cured effortless...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 335.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46865671642 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98351601101 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585074626866 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1537827155 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376045303268 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113073675646 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163514187525 0.071462118173 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284524273019 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.334556861253 0.0609392437508 549% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.