The table illustrates how much of their monthly earnings the citizens of five different European nations spend on eatables, accommodation, garments and amusement.
In an overview, the major portion of the remuneration went towards eatables and accommodation while the least was spent on clothing.
To begin with, almost a quarter of income of France, Germany and UK is spent on eatables whereas Turkey and Spain spend nearly a third on it. Additionally, in terms of accommodation, about 33% of the salary of France, Germany and UK is spent on Housing that is 31%, 33%, 37%, respectively. Turkey and Spain had spent 20% and 18% on the same category.
Probing ahead, less than 10% of France’s and Spain’s monthly income is spent on garments while 15%, 12% and 11% is the ratio of remuneration spent by Germany, Turkey and UK on the same commodity. Lastly, Turkey spends one tenth of its monthly income on amusement and UK spends 11%. Furthermore, this sector is led by Germany at 19% followed by Spain at 15% and France at 13%.
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years.What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be use in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, third, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94886363636 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92325542202 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7733866065 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100415037907 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486318004771 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06213946826 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068332711198 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656965182907 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.