The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.

The line chart compares the per capita consumption of beef, pork, broilers and turkey (in pounds) in the United States from 1955 to 2012.

Overall, American people prefer red meat to poultry for a long time, and this trend changed at the end of the periods.

Between 1955 and 1995, US beef increased quickly from 60 pounds to reach a peak of 90 pounds in 1977, before decreased continuously to around 65 pounds. During this time, while the number of pork fluctuated between 50 and 40 pounds, consume of broilers rose rapidly from 15 pounds (1961) to the same figures of the pork (1995). Besides, US turkey, which the least popular meat, went up slightly from 5 pounds (1961) to just over 10 pounds (2012).

From 1995 to 2012, US beef and pork reduced slowly from 65, 50 pounds to 50, 45 pounds, respectively. Besides, we saw the dramatic rise in the number of broilers which surpassed the figure of the pork (1996) to reach a peak of 60 pounds (2006). Although this number slightly decreased to around 55 pounds, it was still the highest point (2012).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-25 lattethuc 78 view
Essays by user Tri H. Ho :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the United States from 1955 to 2012. Overall, American people prefer red meat...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end changed at the end of the periods. Between 1955 and 1995, US beef increased...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58823529412 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28063424806 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6507795855 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786914017504 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405730761622 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052628167226 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595344701946 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594551226061 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.