The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
Given is the chart illustrating the modification of technology-based household appliances around the UK from 1996/97 to 2002/03.
It is clear from the chart that all the items tended to increase gradually during the examined period. In addition, the CD player was the category receiving the most proportion.
In 1996/97, the CD player was significantly higher than the home computer and mobile phone, at 60%, while two rest items were under 40%. Until the 1998/99, Internet access appeared and stood at the lowest point of 10%. Meanwhile, other domestics saw modest growth of roughly 30% in computer and cell phone and nearly 70% of the CD player.
In two year’s time, although the Internet was not the dominant choice at this period, it witnessed a rapid increase which was approximately twofold than its previous time. The home computer continued a stable climb with slight acceleration until 2002/03, at nearly 60%. At the same time, CD player and mobile phone were the most prevalent, at the highest point of over 80% and 70% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | oxfordpro125 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Rapunzel | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Mike_Moody | 100 | view |
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think may be the reasons for this? What problems might this cause in society? 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 56
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. 60
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11560693642 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80959345156 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3589955088 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0583798548337 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255948427306 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259787779787 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0386982325614 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315655564788 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.