The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who used social networking sites in Canada in two separate years.
It is noticeable that the proportion of those using one site was the highest in both years, while the least people used five sites. Overall, there was a growing tendency to use more than one from 2014 to 2015.
Although just over one-fifth of internet users did not use any networking sites in the two years shown, the proportion in this category slightly fell from 22% in 2014 to 21% after one year. Likewise, the group of people using one site declined sharply from just over one-third in 2014 to 28% in 2015.
In contrast, there was an increase in the figures of those who used two sites, three sites, or five sites over the period analyzed. these figures for these groups was 23%, 12%, 5%, and 2% respectively in 2014, and then rose to 24%, 16%, 8%, and 4% by 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-26 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
- happiness is considered very important in life.why is it difficult to define? what factors are important in achieving happiness? 61
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 42
- the diagram shows the process of how to make smoked fish Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. 73
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...or five sites over the period analyzed. these figures for these groups was 23%, 12%, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59627329193 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2817782746 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1166337826 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192777561439 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106015058502 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578280365396 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137475947245 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587421493638 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.