In the contemporary era, everyone desires to have a bright future for their child. These days, parents are putting huge burden on the children's to score high in exam and elevate in life. There are plenty of factors which lead to this behavior among parents. I think, that these is not the positive approach and people need to change their mind if they want holistic development for their child.
There are plethora of reason for these, but the predominate factors are cut-throat competition and societal pressure. Competition among pupils are increasing day by day. Guardian force juvenile's to score high in examination, perform well in university entrance exam, because they want them to have a successful and prosperous professional career. School grades are being considered as the major criteria to judge the cognitive skills of the youngster. Like, elite Universities are fixing the cut off marks for admission. For example, Delhi University last year cut off for admission in Bachelors of Commerce is 92%. Further, the entrance exam for Engineering and Medical degree's are also becoming extremely assiduous, and the minimum score for admission is continuously elevating. Apart for these, due to peer pressure and to maintain the status in society, everybody want their child to become Engineer, Doctor or Lawyer.
Furthermore, Success actually requires a variety of skills and personality treat. Force to perform well and come in merit, is not the effective way to growth. Everybody likes their freedom and wants to choose the field of their interest. Marks are not the only way to judge the talent and many people fail in school, but succeed in life. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar, the famous cricketer of India failed in school, but he has achieved every thing in his life. Moreover, there are many children who have excelled in the field of art and music. Children must left free and let them grow in their area of interest. If a person enjoy his job, unequivocally he will outperform, which ultimately leads to promotion and salary hikes. Hence, working in free environment, allows every individual to grow.
In conclusion, I would reiterated that parents may have valid reasons for their forceful behavior, but allowing child to work at their own phase and the stream of their wish will help them to excel and prevail in life. In addition, they will learn to manage their own time and career.
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.What can companies do to increase staff productivity? 56
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What are the reasons for doing this?Is this a positive or negative development. 78
- Most people say that childhood and school years are the best years in their lives. Why do you think people say that? Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 11
- As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment? 56
- People no longer use newspaper and television because the internet plays the same role. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e are plethora of reason for these, but the predominate factors are cut-throat competition and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reiterate'
Suggestion: reiterate
...dual to grow. In conclusion, I would reiterated that parents may have valid reasons for...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06532663317 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64361729572 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2663157177 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.652173913 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3043478261 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202155706202 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499413160207 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417657446125 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126175771948 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486858750478 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.