In recent decades, the vast majority of youngsters prefer to spend their precious time by using technological devices. A bunch of people claims that is a positive effect, while others disagree and believe that will lead to some undesirable effect on them.
To begin with, in the last few decades technology advancement drastically altered the social lifestyle of an adult generation by it is convenient, diversity. Two decades ago people cannot imagine that life will change faster than they are expected. By the invention of the internet and smartphones, life became easier for every people not only for children. For instance, a school teacher can convey a message to their school children just a few seconds despite the distance. Likewise, every school student has access to websites where they gathering numerous vital information to school subjects. Therefore, this convincing evidence leads to many people to opted that it is valid.
On the one hand, many people hold the view that technological devices contributed to adverse ramifications for their children. Referring to the survey about the internet, it is clearly seen that most of the youngsters became an internet addictive. To illustrate, every second child in Japan related to the internet addictive group. They tend to spend their darling time on virtual live by playing online games. For this reason, in Japan as a result of local policy government created a special treatment center for internet addictive kids.
To conclude, the dramatical distribution of technology may lead to some negative consequences as well as to it has a plethora of beneficial effects for the children.
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? give reasons and relevant examples. 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Disscuss both view 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, Californiaand the rest of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
...n them. To begin with, in the last few decades technology advancement drastically alte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25757575758 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85001570727 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5390856915 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1691217816 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573833110945 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475154764316 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110057534445 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224064474935 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.