The graph below shows the purchasing of petrol by people from the United States and United Kingdom according to their salaries.
The figure elucidates the number of petrol’s purchasing by individuals in two different nations regarding their incomes from the 1st week to the 4th week. At first glance, it is evident that the high wages’ aspect is higher rather than other aspects in three different weeks.
To begin with, the number of high intakes’ indicator has become the highest categories in the first week, the second week and the fourth week whereas the low wages’ indicator has become the lowest aspect. Both of these two categories approximately achieved at well beyond 40 for high salaries’ indicator and at well beneath 30 for all low revenues’ category.
In contrast in the third week, the amount of high wages’ indicator has lower number, which made up at well under 50 and the total of low salaries’ aspect became the highest indicator, which made up at 90.
In accordance with the medium revenues’ indicator, it remained stable in the 1st week, 2nd week and 4th week where it placed in the second position and accounted for well less than 40 for all weeks. However, it became the lowest aspect in the 3rd week instead of other categories.
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefi 78
- Bar Chart : sales in number for science fiction, novel, history and poetry. 73
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
- The changes in the layout of the Woodward university. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t weeks. To begin with, the number of high intakes' indicator has become ...
^^
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...or all low revenues' category. In contrast in the third week, the amount of high w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, third, well, whereas, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0618556701 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92340306344 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3487225459 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.285714286 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.032065045026 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213207274662 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439438175991 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0259348857315 0.15604864568 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351715350299 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.