the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants.
The figure elucidates the estimation of maximum population of Asian elephants. At the first glance, it is evident that the most dramatic drop occurred in India in between 1997 and 2004.
To begin with, There was a tremendous decline in the number of the elephants’ population in India, Malaysia and Thailand in which all of elephants’ population plunged approximately from 2000 to 2500 species in these three nations. Moreover, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Myanmar and China following the same pattern as the previous countries where all of these states also witnessed a moderate fall in the next 7 years which decreased roughly around 200 to 500 species.
In contrast, the number of elephant population in Cambodia rose steadily between 1997, which was at just over 1000 species, and 2004, which made up at well beyond 1000 species. Nevertheless, Laos experienced a different pattern in which it remained stable in the next following 7 years and it finished at just across 1000 species, which was the same as the previous 7 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Line graph : wheat exports 1985 – 1990. (Canada, Australia, European community) 100
- Bar chart : amount spent on consumer goods (Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain). 78
- The best way to educate children is by using the internet in every lesson.' To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 89
- The following maps show the changes that have taken place in the centre of a town since 1700. 78
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11176470588 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88432705506 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9789314862 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127085864851 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110978192499 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201914291835 0.0843802449381 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121396602484 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121481125974 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.