An urgent problem around the world is the huge production of garbage that our economic model generate day by day. In order to tackle this issue, it is important to identify the causes.
Our life style is one of the main factors of the uncontrolled production of rubbish around the world. The economic circuit need the constant consumption of products to keep stable. For that reason, companies and industries encourage people to obtain the latest version of its products, discarding the oldest and generating immense amount of wastes. For instance, electronic garbage are a current menace to our environment and countries are not running effective policies to regulate and encourage the recycling. In short, the are not a public awareness about the impact of this wastes on society and governments do not have solid policies to stop it.
On the other hand, our society have an excessive use of plastic and that generate uncontrolled volume of plastic wastes. In daily life, plastic is in every place, covering vegetables, clothes, and bread. There are not a public aware about how we use plastic unnecessarily every day. For example, scientific research had warned about the high levels of plastic in oceans and how that is menacing sea-life. Thus, the current plastic problem is not a worldwide concern because, despite there a lot of campaigns on media, people is still using plastic everyday without relevant changes.
In order to deal with this problem, governments have an important role to regulate the massive production of garbage through restrictive laws to industry and shops. Besides, they should make compulsory the use of recycling materials in factories to re-use the plastic produced and decrease the plastic levels.
To conclude, the “use and throw” culture is the main cause of our excessive production of rubbish. Measures like obliged recycling it will be a relevant step to deal with this problem.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with their friends or alone rather than with their families, this trend is likely to have a negative impact on community. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 73
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat. Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letter -explain the reasons for the noise -apologize -describe what action you will take 73
- With the growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM food offers available solution to this problemTo what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbishWhy do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 11
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent.Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and encourage the recycling. In short, the are not a public awareness about the impact...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... a public awareness about the impact of this wastes on society and governments do no...
^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s on society and governments do not have solid policies to stop it. On the ot...
^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...on media, people is still using plastic everyday without relevant changes. In order...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tic everyday without relevant changes. In order to deal with this problem, gove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21725239617 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72911155751 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7665765319 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779441053777 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264074299068 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306246662426 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455605502748 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283067361095 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.