A debate which is raised about how vigorous are today's rules and regulations. Some groups of people hold the view that rules and regulations that teens has to follow are too strict. However, some other groups hold a different view, and feel that today's rules are not too strict enough and need to be more stringent. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups for the reasons I address in this essay.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that rules and regulations may protect people health. A common example which sheds lights on what was elaborated above are the rules and regulations related to smoking in public places. Although some people find those rules as contingent, I think they are fair because passive smoking may have a devastating effect on human's health. To elaborate more smoking may cause heart diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and leukemia.
The second reason which deserves some thought is that rules and regulations can enhance people's safety. Such rules would force people to comply with them and thus keep them safe. For instance, rules which are imposed on drivers can protect citizens from non compliant drivers. Therefore, allow them to reach their homes safe and sound. Without having such rules drivers would think that they own the roads and ultimately result in accidents.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible statistics that was published in the American Journal of motor vehicle. The study shows that the imposed rules and regulations on the road has cause a thirty percent reduction in accidents.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons on soon realizes that rules and regulation are beneficial not only to enhance safety, but also to protect people's health.
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal..... 3
- Edmontosaurs Migration 80
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 68
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal..... 54
- TPO 44 Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e too strict. However, some other groups hold a different view, and feel that tod...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...moking may have a devastating effect on humans health. To elaborate more smoking may c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lth. To elaborate more smoking may cause heart diseases, chronic obstructive pulm...
^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd regulation are beneficial not only to enhance safety, but also to protect peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 965.302439024 169% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1356466877 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62281924765 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 106.607317073 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548895899054 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2156731149 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183892202585 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591613797231 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498930699903 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100356913708 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503839541275 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.