The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities.They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead.
It is argued that the mass media should concentrate on the lives of ordinary people rather than intruding too much on public figures ‘ privacy lives. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with the given statement because of the following reasons.
Firstly, there is no doubt that the story of celebrity is more interesting than that of ordinary individuals. In particular, readers tend to looking for a famous singer or talent football player when reading newspapers, watching televisions as well as surfing social networks. It seems that audiences are often attracted by celebrities’ lives and there relationships such as their expensive clothes, luxury cars or even their families.
Secondly, renowned people have been making a great contribution to the development of media industry. Certainly, the media can earn a large amount of profits by attracting viewers and readers after reporting a recent well-known icons. For examples, the American game show “ Who wants to be a millionaire”, the program that everyone can join, is less viewers three times as much as the talk show “ The Ellen DeGeneres Show”, whose guests always are public figures.
In conclusion, I do not think people will pay much attention to ordinary workers since there is nothing to attract their interests to read more. However, public media companies can make millions dollars each year by appealing viewers or readers, which can provided by only celebrities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | Nguyễn Ngọc Hải Nghi | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos; privacy lives. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with the given state...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... watching televisions as well as surfing social networks. It seems that audiences...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting viewers and readers after reporting a recent well-known icons. For examples,...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'icon'?
Suggestion: icon
...rs after reporting a recent well-known icons. For examples, the American game show ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cent well-known icons. For examples, the American game show ' Who wants to b...
^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;, the program that everyone can join, is less viewers three times as much as t...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun viewers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...the program that everyone can join, is less viewers three times as much as the talk...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40692640693 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97776345681 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.679653679654 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6279953877 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247935116199 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852588985041 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818289034574 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138427384686 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539089103418 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.