do you agree or disagree
Today, there are a lot of news resources around the world that most of them are easily accessible to the people. However, virtually none of the resources is really unbiased. Therefore, I believe that in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Here are some reasons for my opinion.
For one thing, when it comes to news, politics play an important role. Politicians have the authority to interfere in the news resources and slightly change the content of the news in order to pursue their own political purposes. For example, when people of a country are not satisfied with their living conditions they start to protest. They go to the streets with placards and ask for their rights. At this point, When watching the local news, most of the time the truth is mantled and the reporter might claim that these are the people that seek for reble and should be suppressed. Thus, if we just rely on one news resource, we will be deceived.
There is also the fact that people and more specifically the news reporters have their own interpretations of the news. So, by getting information from many different resources, we can put different data together and form our own interpretation. In the previous example, if we watch other news resource, we might be aware of the fact that those people are not really rebelians but are the fretful people striving to achieve their rights. Hence, it is one thing to get information from a few news resources and accept their interpretations, but another to get data from several news resources and build our own interpretation.
All in all, I think many misleading news resources are out there trying to feed people with wrong pieces of data to take advantage of them. But people should be vigilant and do not trust any news without getting data from several resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 70
- Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example traveling to the Moon and to other planets Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth Which of the 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- do you agree or disagree 3
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. Here are some reasons f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e news. So, by getting information from many different resources, we can put different data to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82131661442 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72947340319 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510971786834 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7716777949 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0101072284832 0.236089414692 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00459781528423 0.076458572812 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178072620247 0.0737576698707 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0107534033341 0.150856017488 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018625440929 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.